References

  1. Dunn P, Fraser C, Williamson S, Alderwick H. Integrated care systems: what do they look like? The Health Foundation; 2022 (www.health.org.uk/publications/long-reads/integrated-care-systems-what-do-they-look-like).
  2. House of Commons. Health and Care Act 2022. UK Parliament; 2021–22 (https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3022/publications).
  3. Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Mays N. A cure for everything and nothing? Local partnerships for improving health in England. BMJ; 2022 (www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-070910).
  4. Reed S, Oung C, Davies J, Dayan M, Scobie S. Integrating health and social care: A comparison of policy and progress across the four countries of the UK. Nuffield Trust; 2021 (www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/integrating-health-and-social-care-a-comparison-of-policy-and-progress-across-the-four-countries-of-the-uk#report-overview).
  5. Anderson M, Pitchforth E, Edwards N, Alderwick H, McGuire A et al. United Kingdom: health system review 2022. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2022 (https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/united-kingdom-health-system-review-2022).
  6. Polin K, Hjortland M, Maresso A, Van Ginnekan E, Busse R et al. ‘Top-Three’ health reforms in 31 high-income countries in 2018 and 2019: an expert informed overview. Health Policy; 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.005).
  7. Department of Health and Social Care. Health and social care integration: joining up care for people, places and populations. UK government; 2022 (www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-and-social-care-integration-joining-up-care-for-people-places-and-populations).
  8. NHS England. Invitation for expressions of interest to become Discharge Integration Front Runner sites. NHS England: 2022 (www.england.nhs.uk/publication/invitation-for-expressions-of-interest-to-become-discharge-integration-frontrunner-sites).
  9. Stafford M, Steventon A, Thorlby R, Fisher R, Turnton C et al. Understanding the health care needs of people with multiple health conditions. The Health Foundation; 2018 (www.health.org.uk/publications/understanding-the-health-care-needs-of-people-with-multiple-health-conditions).
  10. Barnet K, Mercer S W, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet; 2012 (doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2).
  11. Tallack C, Charlesworth A, Kelly E, McConkey R, Rocks S. The Bigger Picture. The Health Foundation; 2020 (https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2020-RC10).
  12. Armitage GD, Suter E, Oelke ND and Adair C. Health systems integration: state of the evidence. International Journal of Integrated Care; 2009 (www.ijic.org/article/10.5334/ijic.316).
  13. Douglas N, Mays N, Al-Haboubi M, Manacorda T, Thana L et al. Observations of community-based multidisciplinary team meetings in health and social care for older people with long term conditions in England. BMC Health Services Research; 2022 (bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-022-07971-x#citeas).
  14. Erens B, Wistow G, Mounier-Jack S, Douglas N, Jones L et al. Early evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers Programme. PIRU; 2016–17 (https://piru.ac.uk/projects/current-projects/integrated-care-pioneers-evaluation.html).
  15. Checkland K, Coleman A, Croke S, Billings J, Mikelyte R et al. National Evaluation of the Vanguard New Care Models Programme Report of qualitative case studies: Understanding system change. PRUComm; 2021 (http://prucomm.ac.uk/august-2021-national-evaluation-of-the-vanguard-new-care-models-programme-report-of-qualitative-case-studies.html).
  16. Alderwick, H, Ham C. Sustainability and transformation plans for the NHS in England: what do they say and what happens next? BMJ; 2017 (doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1541).
  17. Lewis R Q, Checkland K, Durand M A, Ling T, Mays N et al. Integrated Care in England – what can we Learn from a Decade of National Pilot Programmes? International Journal of Integrated Care; 2021 (www.ijic.org/articles/10.5334/ijic.5631).
  18. Raine R, Wallace I, Nic a’ Bháird C, Xanthopoulou P, Lanceley A et al. Improving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational study. Health Services and Delivery Research; 2014 (http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25642498).
  19. NHS England. Investment and evolution: A five-year framework for GP contract reform to implement The NHS Long Term Plan. NHS England; 2019 (www.england.nhs.uk/publication/gp-contract-five-year-framework).
  20. NHS England. Next steps for integrating primary care: Fuller stocktake report. NHS England; 2022 (www.england.nhs.uk/publication/next-steps-for-integrating-primary-care-fuller-stocktake-report).
  21. NHS England. Integrated care systems: design framework. NHS England; 2021 (https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3).
  22. NHS England. Building strong integrated care systems everywhere. NHS England; 2021 (www.england.nhs.uk/publication/integrated-care-systems-guidance).
  23. Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E et al. The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Services Research; 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3).
  24. Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Briggs A, Mays N. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health; 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1).
  25. Lloyd T, Conti S, Alderwick H, Wolters A. Have integrated care programmes reduced emergency admissions? Lessons for Integrated Care Systems (ICSs). The Health Foundation; 2021 (www.health.org.uk/publications/long-reads/have-integrated-care-programmes-reduced-emergency-admissions).
  26. Lloyd T, Brine R, Pearson R, Caunt M, Steventon A. The impact of integrated care teams on hospital use in North East Hampshire and Farnham. The Health Foundation; 2018 (www.health.org.uk/publications/impact-integrated-care-teams-hospital-use-north-east-hampshire-and-farnham).
  27. Vestesson E, Shen J, Pariza, Wolters A. The impact of Extensive Care Service and Enhanced Primary Care in Fylde Coast. The Health Foundation; 2020 (https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2020-DA19).
  28. The Proactive Care framework (https://future.nhs.uk/CommunityHealthServices/view?objectID=35027280) with access on request.
  29. Clarke G, Pariza P, Wolters A. The long-term impacts of new care models on hospital use. The Health Foundation; 2020 (https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2020-DA03).
  30. Kumpunen S, Edwards N, Georghiou T, Hughes G. Why do evaluations of integrated care not produce the results we expect? International Journal of Care Coordination; 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434520909089).
  31. Seamer P, O’Neill S, Lloyd T, Conti S. The long-term impacts of new care models on hospital use: an evaluation of the North East Hampshire and Farnham Vanguard programme. The Health Foundation; 2021 (www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-10/2021-iau_integratedcare_nehf.pdf).
  32. Seamer P, Lloyd T, Conti S. The long-term impacts of new care models on hospital use: an evaluation of the Fylde Coast Vanguard programme. The Health Foundation; 2021 (www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-11/2021-iau_integratedcare_fylde.pdf.pdf).
  33. Abendstern M, Harrington V, Brand C, Tucker S, Wilberforce M et al. Variations in structures, processes and outcomes of community mental health teams for older people: a systematic review of the literature. National Institute for Health Research; 2012 (https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.651431).
  34. Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E et al. Understanding new models of integrated care in developed countries: a systematic review. NIHR; 2018 (https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06290).
  35. Davies S L, Goodman C, Bunn F, Victor C, Dickinson A et al. A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services. BMC Health Services Research; 2011 (https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-320).
  36. Edwards S T, Peterson K, Chan B, Anderson J, Helfand M. Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine; 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4174-z).
  37. Stokes J, Panagioti M, Alam R, Checkland K, Cheranghi-Sohi S et al. Effectiveness of Case Management for ‘At Risk’ Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. NIHR GM PSTRC; 2015 (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132340).
  38. Deschodt M, Laurent G, Cornelissen L, Yip O, Zúñiga F et al. Core components and impact of nurse-led integrated care models for home-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies; 2020 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32200100).
  39. Damery S, Flanagan S, Combes G. Does integrated care reduce hospital activity for patients with chronic diseases? An umbrella review of systematic reviews. BMJ Open; 2016 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011952).
  40. Flanagan S, Damery S, Combes G. The effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving patient quality of life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. An overview of the systematic review evidence. BMC; 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0765-y).
  41. Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008 (https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/m/caring-for-people-with-chronic-conditions-a-health-system-perspective).
  42. Kadu M K, Stolee P. Facilitators and barriers of implementing the chronic care model in primary care: a systematic review. BMC; 2015 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0219-0).
  43. Coleman K, Austin B T, Brach C, Wagner E H. Evidence On The Chronic Care Model In The New Millennium. Health Affairs; 2009 (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091929).
  44. Beech J, Bottery S, Charlesworth A, Evans H, Gershlick B et al. Closing the gap: key areas for action on the health and care workforce. The Health Foundation; 2019 (www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/closing-the-gap).
  45. Shembavnekar N, Buchan J, Bazeer N, Kelly E, Beech J et al. Projections: General practice workforce in England. The Health Foundation; 2022 (www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/projections-general-practice-workforce-in-england).
  46. Goldzahl L, Stokes J, Sutton J. The effects of multi-disciplinary integrated care on healthcare utilization: Evidence from a natural experiment in the UK. Health Economics; 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4561).
  47. Parry W, Wolters A T, Brine R J, Steventon A. Effect of an integrated care pathway on use of primary and secondary healthcare by patients at high risk of emergency inpatient admission: a matched control cohort study in Tower Hamlets. Health Services Research; 2019 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026470).
  48. Wilson P, Billings J, MacInnes J, Mikelyte R, Welch E et al. Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis. Health Research Policy and Systems; 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3).
  49. Kumpunen S, Edwards N, Georghiou T, Hughes G. Evaluating integrated care: Why are evaluations not producing the results we expect? Nuffield Trust; 2019 (www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/evaluating-integrated-care-why-are-evaluations-not-producing-the-results-we-expect).
  50. Roland M, Abel G. Reducing emergency admission: are we on the right track? BMJ; 2012 (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6017).
  51. Lewis G H. ‘Impactibility models’: identifying the subgroup of high-risk patients most amenable to hospital-avoidance programs. Milbank Q; 2010 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00597.x).
  52. Steventon A, Bilings J. Preventing hospital readmissions: the importance of considering ‘impactibility,’ not just predicted risk. BMJ Quality & Safety; 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006629).
  53. Hughes G, Shaw S E, Greenhalgh T. Why doesn’t integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case. Sociology of Health and Illness; 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13398).
  54. Barker I, Steventon A, Deeny S R. Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data. BMJ; 2017 (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j84).
  55. Brown, S. Qualitative evaluation of South Warwickshire place based teams final report. SQW; 2021 (www.sqw.co.uk/insights-and-publications/evaluation-place-based-teams).
  56. Baird B, Chauhan K, Boyle T, Heller A, Price C. How to build effective teams in general practice. The King’s Fund; 2020 (www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/effective-teams-general-practice).
  57. Health Education England. Working differently together: Progressing a one workforce approach - Multidisciplinary Team Toolkit. Health Education England; 2021 (www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/workforce-transformation/multidisciplinary-team-mdt-toolkit).
  58. CordisBright. What are the key factors for successful multidisciplinary team working? CordisBright; 2018 (www.cordisbright.co.uk/news/multidisciplinary-team-working).
  59. National Cancer Action Team. Characteristics of an Effective MDT. NCRAS; 2010 (www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_type_and_topic_specific_work/multidisciplinary_teams/mdt_development).
  60. Crisp H, Watt A, Jones B, Amevenu D, Warburton W. Improving flow along care pathways: learning from the Flow Coaching Academy programme. The Health Foundation; 2020 (https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2020-I04).
  61. Erens B, Durand M A, Al-Haboubi M, Wistow G, Thana L. Economic and impact evaluation of health and social care integrated community-based Multi-Disciplinary Teams: results from a survey of staff involved in MDTs. PIRU; 2021 (https://piru.ac.uk/assets/files/MDT%20staff%20survey%202020%20report%20(Erens%20et%20al)%20Final%20October%202021.pdf).
  62. Gray M, Barford A. The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society; 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy019).
  63. Alexiou A, Fahy K, Mason K, Bennett D, Brown H et al. Local government funding and life expectancy in England: a longitudinal ecological study. The Lancet; 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00110-9).
  64. Finch D. Today’s public health grant announcement provides some certainty, but more investment is needed over the longer-term. The Health Foundation; 2020 (www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/news/response-to-public-health-grant).
  65. Paddison C, Crellin N. Falling short: how far have we come in improving support for unpaid carers in England? Nuffield Trust; 2022 (www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/falling-short-how-far-have-we-come-in-improving-support-for-unpaid-carers-in-england).
  66. Lloyd T, Conti S, Santos F, Steventon A. Effect on secondary care of providing enhanced support to residential and nursing home residents: a subgroup analysis of a retrospective matched cohort study. BMJ; 2019 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009130).
  67. Wolters W, Santos F, Lloyd T, Lilburne C, Steventon A. Emergency admissions to hospital from care homes: how often and what for? The Health Foundation; 2019 (www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/emergency-admissions-to-hospital-from-care-homes).
  68. Miller, R. SCIE. Multidisciplinary teams: Integrating care in places and neighbourhoods. SCIE; 2022 (www.scie.org.uk/integrated-care/workforce/role-multidisciplinary-team).
  69. Hardie T, Horton T, Thornton-Lee N, Home J, Pereira P. Developing learning health systems in the UK: Priorities for action. The Health Foundation; 2022 (https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2022-I06).
  70. Battye, F. The Strategy Unit. Logic Models for Complex Programmes. The Strategy Unit; 2017 (www.strategyunitwm.nhs.uk/publications/logic-models-complex-programmes).
  71. Networked Data Lab: using linked data to tackle health and care challenges. The Health Foundation; 2021 (www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/newsletter-features/networked-data-lab-using-linked-data-to-tackle-health-and-care-challenges).
  72. Hodgson K, Butler J E, Davies A, Houston S, Marszalek K et al. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on the clinically extremely vulnerable population. The Health Foundation; 2021 (www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/assessing-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-clinically-extremely-vulnerable-population).
  73. Grimm F, Alcock B, Butler J, Fernandez Crespo R, Davies A et al. Improving children and young people’s mental health services: Local data insights from England, Scotland and Wales. The Health Foundation; 2022 (https://doi.org/10.37829/HF-2022-NDL1).
  74. Delivering insight for decision makers: improving safety and patient flow in intensive care. The Health Foundation; 2020–21 (www.health.org.uk/funding-and-partnerships/programmes/delivering-insight-for-decision-makers).
  75. Enablers for success: virtual wards including hospital at home. NHS England; 2022 (www.england.nhs.uk/publication/enablers-for-success-virtual-wards).
  76. National Diabetes Audit and Diabetes Prevention Programme (NDA-DPP) pilot study. NHS Digital; 2022 (https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/clinical-audits-and-registries/national-diabetes-audit-and-diabetes-prevention-programme-nda-dpp-pilot-study).
  77. NHSX Delivery Plan. NHS England – Transformation Directorate; 2023 (https://transform.england.nhs.uk/digitise-connect-transform/nhsx-delivery-plan/#digitise-overview).
  78. Lloyd T. Why before-and-after analyses can give misleading results. The Health Foundation; 2018 (www.health.org.uk/newsletter-feature/why-before-and-after-analyses-can-give-misleading-results).
  79. Lloyd T, Deeny S R, Steventon A. Weekend admissions may be associated with poorer recording of long-term comorbidities: a prospective study of emergency admissions using administrative data. BMC Health Services Research; 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3668-7).
  80. Lloyd T, Crellin E, Brine R J, Shen J Y, Wolters A T. Association between household context and emergency hospital use in older people: a retrospective cohort study on indicators for people living alone or living with somebody with frailty, developed from routine healthcare data in England. BMJ; 2022 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059371).
  81. Improvement Analytics Unit (IAU). The Health Foundation [website] (www.health.org.uk/funding-and-partnerships/our-partnerships/improvement-analytics-unit).
  82. The Strategy Unit. NHS [website] (www.strategyunitwm.nhs.uk).
  83. RSET Rapid Service Evaluation Team. Nuffield Trust [website] (www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/rset-the-rapid-service-evaluation-team).
  84. NIHR BRACE Rapid Evaluation Centre. University of Birmingham [website] (www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/brace/index.aspx).
  85. The Greater Manchester rapid service evaluation team – REVAL. (https://arc-gm.nihr.ac.uk/reval)
  86. Applied Research Collaborations. NIHR [website] (www.nihr.ac.uk/explore-nihr/support/collaborating-in-applied-health-research.htm).
  87. Developing a versatile tool for modelling pathway capacity in NHS organisations. The Health Foundation (www.health.org.uk/improvement-projects/developing-a-versatile-tool-for-modelling-pathway-capacity-in-nhs-organisations).
  88. Sharing adult social care workforce data across London to support operational and strategic commissioning decision-making: Brent Council. The Health Foundation (www.health.org.uk/funding-and-partnerships/projects/sharing-adult-social-care-workforce-data-across-london-to-su).
  89. Improving lesion recognition using routinely collected endoscopic and pathology data: Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust. The Health Foundation (www.health.org.uk/funding-and-partnerships/programmes/improving-lesion-recognition-using-routinely-collected-endos).
  90. NHS England – Transformation Directorate. Analytics as a Profession. NHS England (https://transform.england.nhs.uk/key-tools-and-info/nhsx-analytics-unit/nhsx-analytics-unit-programmes/analytics-profession).
  91. AphA. The Association of professional healthcare analysts [website] (www.aphanalysts.org).
  92. NHS-R Community [website] (https://nhsrcommunity.com).
  93. R-Ladies Global [website] (https://rladies.org).
  94. NHS England – Transformation Directorate. Innovation Analytics. NHS England [website] (https://transform.england.nhs.uk/key-tools-and-info/nhsx-analytics-unit/nhsx-analytics-unit-programmes/innovation-analytics).
  95. Clarke G M, Conti S, Wolters A T, Steventon A. Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data. BMJ; 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2239).
  96. IAU Resources for robust evaluation. The Health Foundation (www.health.org.uk/funding-and-partnerships/our-partnerships/improvement-analytics-unit/iau-resources-for-robust-evaluation).
  97. The Health Foundation Analytics Lab. Github (https://github.com/HFAnalyticsLab).
  98. Better evaluation [website] (www.betterevaluation.org).
  99. UK Evaluation Society [website] (www.evaluation.org.uk/professional-development/training).
  100. AnalystX resources [website] (https://analystx.uk/resources).
  101. Bardsley M, Steventon A, Fothergill G. Untapped potential: Investing in health and care data analytics. The Health Foundation; 2019 (www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/untapped-potential-investing-in-health-and-care-data-analytics).
Previous