Impacts on social care

The impact of COVID-19 on social care in England has been severe. In this section of the briefing, we summarise data on COVID-19 cases and outbreaks, movement to and from hospital for care home residents, and deaths of social care users and staff. We place deaths in England in an international context – though comparable data between countries are limited. We also identify gaps in data that limit our understanding about the impact on social care.

Cases and outbreaks

By the end of May, 40% of all care homes had reported a COVID-19 outbreak. Outbreaks varied significantly across the country: 51% of care homes in the north-east had reported an outbreak, compared to 28% of care homes in the south-west. Initial results from a survey of over 9,000 care homes for older residents and those with dementia in England, published in July, estimated that over half of the care homes included in the study had reported at least one confirmed COVID-19 case among either staff or residents. Of these care homes, it was estimated that 20% of residents and 7% of staff had tested positive for COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic. Between 2 and 8 May, CQC reported that around a fifth of domiciliary care providers were caring for at least one person with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.

Hospital discharges to care homes

Hospital discharges to care homes dropped, overall, between 17 March and 30 April. But discharges to nursing homes actually increased compared to the historical average.

Access to health care: hospital admissions among care home residents

Admissions to hospital for care home residents decreased substantially as the pandemic unfolded, with 11,800 fewer admissions during March and April compared to previous years. Elective admissions dropped more dramatically than emergency admissions. And admissions from residential care homes decreased more substantially than from nursing homes. There may be several reasons for this reduction in activity, including policy choices to create hospital capacity – for example, national policies in the NHS to cancel planned operations to help free up space for COVID-19 patients – and changes in the way that care is provided. Infection risks in hospitals may have affected clinical decisions. But the data suggest that there may be unmet need for health care among care home residents as a result of COVID-19.

Deaths

Excess deaths are used to count the number of deaths caused by a particular event, such as a pandemic, that would have been unlikely to occur if the event had not happened. Between 23 March and 19 June 2020, there were more than 30,500 excess deaths among care home residents in England (208% of the average deaths seen in 2017–2019). There were more than 17,700 notifications of deaths involving COVID-19 among care home residents.

CQC introduced a new method of identifying deaths involving COVID-19 for providers registered with CQC on 10 April. By 19 June, CQC had been notified of 819 deaths involving COVID-19 in domiciliary care. Between 23 March and 19 June, there were an estimated 4,500 excess deaths among people receiving domiciliary care (225% of the average deaths seen in 2017-2019). The majority of these deaths have not been linked to COVID-19. Several factors may have contributed to the increase in non-COVID-19 linked deaths in care homes and domiciliary care, including unidentified COVID-19, unmet needs, changes to place of death, and changes in reporting.

There have been high numbers of deaths among people with a learning disability and those subject to the Mental Health Act (including people detained in hospital and those in the community who are subject to the Act) during the pandemic so far. There has also been a disproportionate number of deaths among those from black and minority ethnic groups in adult social care. There has also been a grim toll on staff: people working in social care have been around twice as likely to die of COVID-19 than the general population.

Data

New data collection approaches have been established throughout the pandemic, but not all the data is made public and there are still significant gaps. Data on testing and the spread of infection are lacking across all social care settings, but particularly in domiciliary care. And data on the impact of COVID-19 among domiciliary care users and staff remain limited. There are no data to understand the impact of COVID-19 on those receiving unpaid care.

International data on impacts

England is not alone in experiencing challenges protecting social care from the pandemic. Early data suggest that the impact of COVID-19 among residents and staff in care homes has varied widely between countries., There are no good comparable data to help understand the impact of COVID-19 on community-based social care services internationally.

International comparisons of COVID-19 impacts on social care are complex and risk being misleading. The structure and design of social care services differs between countries. And various other contextual factors – funding levels, integration with health care services, workforce gaps, and other structural issues – will have shaped the policy response and impact in different countries. There has also been no common international approach to testing and recording deaths during the pandemic, limiting what we can learn from early comparisons. That said, there has also been wide variation in the policy measures put in place to protect social care services during the initial stages of the pandemic – including in approaches to testing, financial support, and medical care available to care homes. These differences offer policymakers opportunities to learn from each other as the outbreak unfolds.


CQC is notified of deaths from care providers that they regulate where the person died while a regulated activity was being provided – or where their death may have been a result of the regulated activity or how it was provided.

Previous Next