Notes and references

  1. Perla R, Reid A, Cohen S, Parry G. Health care reform and the trap of the “iron law” [weblog]. Health Affairs. 2015. Available from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/04/22/health-care-reform-and-the-trap-of-the-iron-law (accessed 9 August 2018).
  2. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AS, Patchen Dellinger E, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;360:491–499.
  3. Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R, Wilton AS, Baxter NN. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370:1029–1038.
  4. Rossi P. The iron law of evaluation and other metallic rules. In Miller JL, Lewis M. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy. 4th edition. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press; 1987. pp. 3–20.
  5. Howarth E, Devers K, Moore G, O’Cathain A, Dixon-Woods M. Contextual issues and qualitative research. In Raine R, Fitzpatrick R, Barratt H, Bevan G, Black N, Boaden R et al. Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2016;4(16):105–120.
  6. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition. New York: Simon & Schulster; 2003.
  7. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82(4):581–629.
  8. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011;6:42.
  9. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ. 2008;336:1472.
  10. Hoffmann T, Erueti C, Glasziou P. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755.
  11. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:979–83.
  12. Hawe P. Lessons from complex interventions to improve health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2015;36:307–323.
  13. Bauman LJ, Stein RE, Ireys HT. Reinventing fidelity: The transfer of social technology among settings. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1991;19:619–639.
  14. Guise JM, Chang C, Butler M, Viswanathan M, Tugwell P. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017;90:6–10.
  15. Wells M, Williams B, Treweek S, Coyle J, Taylor J. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials. 2012;13:95.
  16. Bate P, Robert G, Fulop N, Øvretveit J, Dixon-Woods M. Perspectives on context: A selection of essays considering the role of context in successful quality improvement. London: The Health Foundation; 2014.
  17. Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016;25:509–517.
  18. Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Taylor BS, McCannon CJ, Lindberg C, Lester RT. How complexity science can inform scale-up and spread in health care: understanding the role of self-organization in variation across local contexts. Social Science and Medicine. 2013;93:194–202.
  19. Rickles D, Hawe P, Shiell A. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2007;61:933–937.
  20. Damiani E, Donati A, Serafini G, Rinaldi L, Adrario E, Pelaia P, et al. Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0125827.
  21. Tarrant C, O’Donnell B, Martin G, Bion J, Hunter A, Rooney KD. A complex endeavour: an ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle. Implementation Science. 2016;11:149.
  22. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
  23. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2015;24:10.
  24. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ, 2001;323(7313):625–628.
  25. The Evidence Centre. Evidence scan: Complex adaptive systems. London: The Health Foundation; 2010.
  26. Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008;336:1281–1283.
  27. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328:1561–1563.
  28. Rogers PJ. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation. 2008;14(1):29–48.
  29. Rutter H, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins C, Shiell A, et al. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2602–2604.
  30. Tadd W. Surviving Sepsis: Formative evaluation of the implementation process. Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust; 2017. Unpublished.
  31. Laverty A. Global problem, local action: tackling sepsis in Northumbria [weblog]. London: The Health Foundation; 2017. Available from: www.health.org.uk/blog/global-problem-local-action-tackling-sepsis-northumbria (accessed 9 August 2018).
  32. Roberts T. Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust: Sepsis Six outcomes analysis. North East Quality Observatory Service; 2017. Unpublished.
  33. Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Avelin EL, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. The Milbank Quarterly. 2011;89(2):167–205.
  34. Dixon-Woods M, Graham M, Tarrant C, Bion J, Goeschel C, Pronovost P et al. Safer Clinical Systems: evaluation findings. London: The Health Foundation; 2014.
  35. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
  36. Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen L, Akande V., Winter C, Reading S et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006;113:177–82.
  37. Shoushtarian M, Barnett M, McMahon F, Ferris J. Impact of introducing practical obstetric multi-professional training (PROMPT) into Maternity Units in Victoria, Australia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014;121:1710–1718.
  38. Draycott T. Can understanding context improve how we deliver training? [webpage]. London: The Health Foundation; 2014. Available from: www.health.org.uk/newsletter/can-understanding-context-improve-how-we-deliver-training (accessed 9 August 2018)
  39. The Health Foundation. The PROMPT system: an innovation in peri-operative care [webpage]. London: The Health Foundation; 2018. Available from: www.health.org.uk/programmes/innovating-improvement/projects/prompt-system-innovation-peri-operative-care (accessed 9 August 2018)
  40. Dixon-Woods M. Final report on the evaluation of Safer Clinical Systems: findings from the extension phase. London: The Health Foundation; 2016. Unpublished.
  41. Microsystem Coaching Academy (MCA). Flow Coaching Academy (FCA) [website]. Available from: www.sheffieldmca.org.uk/flow/ (accessed 9 August 2018).
  42. Spring Impact. Scale Accelerator Insight 2016–2017 [website]. Available from: www.springimpact.org/2017/12/scaling-social-impact-uk-insights-scale-accelerator-2/ (accessed 10 August 2018).
  43. Coulter A. Implementing shared decision making in the UK: a report for The Health Foundation. London: The Health Foundation; 2009.
  44. Glidewell L, Boocock S, Pine K, Campbell R, Hackett J, Gill S, et al. Using behavioural theories to optimise shared haemodialysis care: a qualitative intervention development study of patient and professional experience. Implementation Science. 2013;8:118.
  45. Interview with programme evaluator.
  46. Interview with programme leader.
  47. Albury D, Beresford T, Dew S, Horton T, Illingworth J, Langford K. Against the odds: Successfully scaling innovation in the NHS. London: Innovation Unit; 2018.
  48. Perrigot R. Email to authors. 7 September 2017.
  49. Aveling EL, Martin G, Jiménez García S, Martin L, Herbert G, Armstrong N, et al. Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2012;21:1034–1041.
  50. Whitehouse C, Dixon-Woods M. Using clinical communities to improve quality: Ten lessons for getting the clinical communities approach. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.
  51. Ling T, Stewart K, Garrod B, Hocking L, Newbould J, Gendronneau C. Evaluation of the second phase of the Q Initiative 2016–2020: Interim report. RAND Europe; 2018. Unpublished.
  52. Miller RL, Shinn M. Learning from communities: overcoming difficulties in dissemination of prevention and promotion efforts. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2005. 35(3/4):169–183.
  53. British Lung Foundation. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) statistics [website]. London: British Lung Foundation; 2007. Available from: https://statistics.blf.org.uk/copd (accessed 9 August 2018).
  54. Yohannes AM, Alexopoulos GS. Depression and anxiety in patients with COPD. European Respiratory Review. 2014;23(133):345–349.
  55. The Health Foundation. Promoting a positive life experience for COPD patients [webpage]. London: The Health Foundation; 2015. Available from: www.health.org.uk/programmes/shine-2014/projects/promoting-positive-life-experience-copd-patients (accessed 9 August 2018).
  56. University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry University. Shine 2014 final report. RIPPLE: Respiratory Innovation: Promoting positive life experience. London: The Health Foundation; 2015.
  57. Dodd P. Spreading Improvement programme expression of interest: Making waves – promoting a positive life experience for COPD patients: Ripple 2. South East Staffordshire and Seisdon Peninsula Clinical Commissioning Group; 2014. Unpublished.
  58. Taylor A, Sewell L. Evaluation of the Making Waves: RIPPLE 2 Spread Project. Coventry University; 2018. Unpublished.
  59. Interview with implementation site lead.
  60. Interview with implementation site lead.
  61. Dodd P. Making Waves – Promoting a positive experience for people with COPD [conference presentation]. ISQua 2017 Conference. Programme available from: www.health.org.uk/sites/health/files/ISQua%20conference%20Programme%202017%20-%20draft.pdf (accessed 9 August 2018).
  62. Interview with innovator.
  63. Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Evidence: Overcoming challenges to improving quality. London: The Health Foundation; 2012.
  64. Sutton E, Dixon-Woods M, Tarrant C. Ethnographic process evaluation of a quality improvement project to improve transitions of care for older people. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010988.
  65. Lloyd T, Wolters A, Steventon A. Briefing: The impact of providing enhanced support for care home residents in Rushcliffe. London: The Health Foundation; 2017.
  66. Burd H, Hallsworth M. Spreading change: A guide to enabling the spread of person- and community-centred approaches for health and wellbeing. London: The Health Foundation; 2016.
  67. Briñol P, Petty RE. Source factors in persuasion: a self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology. 2009;20(1):49–96.
  68. Davies HTO, Nutley SM, Mannion R. Organisational culture and quality of health care. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2000;9:111–119.
  69. Stokes K, Barker R, Piggot R. Which doctors take up promising ideas? New insights from open data. London: Nesta; 2014.
  70. de Silva D (The Evidence Centre). Evidence scan No. 21: Improvement collaboratives in health care. London: The Health Foundation; 2014.
  71. Norton MI, Mochon D, Ariely D. The IKEA effect: when labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2012;22(3):453–60.
  72. Dixon-Woods M, Leslie M, Tarrant C, Bion J. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implementation Science. 2013;8:70.
  73. Starling A. Some assembly required: implementing new models of care. London: The Health Foundation; 2017.
  74. National Audit Office. Developing new care models through NHS vanguards. London: National Audit Office; 2018.
  75. Wolfe I, Cass H, Thompson MJ, Craft A, Peile E, Wiegersma PA, et al. Improving child health services in the UK: insights from Europe and their implications for the NHS reforms. BMJ. 2011;342:1277.
  76. Sidebotham P, Fraser J, Fleming P, Ward-Platt M, Hain R. Patterns of child death in England and Wales. The Lancet 2014;384:904–914.
  77. Goldenhar L, Brady P, Sutcliffe K, Muething SE. Huddling for high reliability and situation awareness. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2013;22:899–906.
  78. Reece A. Safe prescribing tools: DRUG-gle (Druggle) [webpage]. Meds IQ. 2015. Available from: www.medsiq.org/tool/drug-gle-druggle (accessed 9 August 2018)
  79. Information provided by site lead.
  80. Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London. S.A.F.E: Situation Awareness for Everyone: Health Foundation final report. London: The Health Foundation; 2016. Unpublished.
  81. Interviews with programme and implementation site leads.
  82. Stapley E, Sharples E, Lachman P, Lakhanpaul M, Wolpert M, Deighton J. Factors to consider in the introduction of huddles on clinical wards: perceptions of staff on the SAFE programme. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2018;30(1):44–49.
  83. Edbrooke-Childs J, Hayes J, Sharples E, Gondek D, Stapley E, Sevdalis N, et al. Development of the Huddle Observation Tool for structured case management discussions to improve situation awareness on inpatient clinical wards. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2018;27:365–372.
  84. Deighton J, Edbrooke-Childs J, Stapley E, Sevdalis N, Hayes J, Gondek D et al. Realistic evaluation of Situation Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) on paediatric wards: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e014014.
  85. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. S.A.F.E. resource 5 – Huddling [RCPCH website article]. 2018. Available from: www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/safe-resource-5-huddling (accessed 9 August 2018).
  86. Jones B, Woodhead T. Building the foundations for improvement: How five UK trusts built quality improvement capability at scale within their organisations. London: The Health Foundation; 2015.
  87. Dorgan S, Layton D, Bloom N, Homkes R, Sadun R, Van Reenen J. Management in Healthcare: Why good practice really matters. London: McKinsey & Company; 2010.
  88. Jones L, Pomeroy L, Robert G, Burnett S, Anderson JE, Fulop NJ. How do hospital boards govern for quality improvement? A mixed methods study of 15 organisations in England. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017:26:978–986.
  89. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Quality Improvement – training for better outcomes. London: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges; 2016.
  90. The Evidence Centre. Evidence scan: Quality improvement training for healthcare professionals. London: The Health Foundation; 2012.
  91. Deeny SR, Steventon A. Making sense of the shadows: priorities for creating a learning healthcare system based on routinely collected data. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2015;24:505–515.
  92. Bardsley M. Understanding analytical capability in health care: Do we have more data than insight? London: The Health Foundation; 2016.
Previous Next